]> Git — Sourcephile - haskell/symantic.git/blob - symantic/README.md
Add common instances to Interpreting.Dup.
[haskell/symantic.git] / symantic / README.md
1 # symantic
2
3 This is an experimental library for composing, parsing, typing, compiling, transforming and interpreting
4 a custom DSL (Domain-Specific Language).
5
6 # Features
7
8 Those custom DSL can express a subset of GHC's Haskell type system:
9
10 * *first class functions* (aka. *lambdas*),
11 * chosen *monomorphic types* (like `Bool` or `Maybe`),
12 * chosen *rank-1 polymorphic types* (like `(Maybe a)`),
13 * chosen *type class instances*,
14 * chosen *type family instances*,
15 * and chosen *type constraints*;
16
17 where "chosen X" means declared in Haskell
18 and selected when composing the DSL.
19
20 In particular, this library is currently not able to:
21
22 * do *type inferencing* for the argument of *lambdas*
23 (they must all be explicitely annotated, aka. *Church-style*),
24 * do *pattern matching* (aka. *case*) (but *Church-encoding* functions are often enough),
25 * do *rank-N polymorphic types* (aka. *non-prenex forall*, like `(forall s. ST s a) -> a`).
26
27 And by itself, the DSL is only able to define new terms to be interpreted,
28 no new types, or other type-level structures.
29
30 # Warning
31
32 Please be aware that despite its using of powerful ideas from clever people,
33 this remains a FUND-LESS SINGLE-PERSON EXPERIMENTAL LIBRARY.
34 Meaning that it IS NOT heavily tested and documented,
35 DOES NOT have a strong commitment to preserving backward compatibility,
36 MAY FAIL to comply with the [PVP](http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy),
37 and CAN die without notice.
38 You've been warned.
39
40 # Use cases
41
42 The main goal of this library is to enable the runtime interpretation of terms,
43 type-checked according to some types defined at composing-time (ie. GHC's compile-time).
44
45 Using a DSL enables to limit expressiveness in order to ease analysis.
46 Here the idea is that the more complex logic shall remain written in Haskell,
47 and then this library used to project an interface into a DSL
48 (using GHC's Haskell as a FFI (Foreign Function Interface)).
49 This in order to give runtime users the flexibility
50 to write programs not requiring a full-blown Haskell compiler,
51 yet enabling enough flexibility to let them express complex needs
52 with a reasonably advanced type-safe way
53 and a controlled environment of primitives.
54
55 ## Typical use cases
56
57 * Enabling runtime users to enter some Haskell-like expressions
58 (maybe with a more convenient syntax wrt. the domain problem)
59 without using at runtime all the heavy machinery and ecosystem of GHC
60 (eg. by using [hint](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/hint)),
61 but still leaning on primitive functions coded in GHC's Haskell.
62 * Limiting those expressions to be built from well-controlled expressions only.
63 * Run some analyzes/optimizations on those well-controlled expressions.
64 * Report errors specific to the domain problem.
65
66 # Usage
67
68 Please learn how to use this library by reading example source files in `test/`
69 in [symantic-lib](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/symantic-lib)
70 in [Git repository](git://git.autogeree.net/symantic).
71
72 These `test` files use [megaparsec](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/megaparsec) as parser
73 (see `test/Testing/Megaparsec.hs`) and a default grammar somehow sticking to Haskell's,
74 but staying context-free (so in particular: insensitive to the indentation),
75 and supporting prefix and postfix operators.
76 This grammar — itself written as a symantic embedded DSL
77 with [symantic-grammar](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/symantic-grammar) —
78 can be reused to build other ones, is not bound to a specific parser,
79 and can produce its own EBNF rendition.
80
81 # Acknowledgements
82
83 This library would probably be much worse than it is
84 without the following seminal works:
85
86 * [Finally Tagless](http://okmij.org/ftp/tagless-final/) by Jacques Carette, Oleg Kiselyov, and Chung-chieh Shan.
87 * [Dependent Types in Haskell](http://cs.brynmawr.edu/~rae/papers/2016/thesis/eisenberg-thesis.pdf) by Richard A. Eisenberg.
88 * [A reflection on types](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/dynamic.pdf) by Simon Peyton Jones, Stephanie Weirich, Richard A. Eisenberg and Dimitrios Vytiniotis.
89 * [Typeable](https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Typeable) by Ben Gamari and others.
90
91 # Main ideas
92
93 * __Symantic DSL__.
94 Terms are encoded in the [Tagless-Final](http://okmij.org/ftp/tagless-final/) way (aka. the *symantic* way)
95 which leverages the *type class* system of Haskell — instead of using *data types* — to form an embedded DSL.
96 More specifically, a *class* encodes the *syntax* of terms (eg. `Sym_Bool`)
97 and its *class instances* on a dedicated type encodes their *semantics*
98 (eg. `(Sym_Bool Eval)` interprets a term as a value of its type
99 in the host language (`Bool` in Haskell here),
100 or `(Sym_Bool View)` interprets a term as a textual rendition, etc.).
101
102 DSL are then composed/extended by selecting those symantic *classes*
103 (and in an embedded DSL those could even be automatically inferred,
104 when `NoMonomorphismRestriction` is on).
105 Otherwise, when using symantics for a non-embedded DSL
106 — the whole point of this library — the *classes* composing the DSL
107 are selected manually at GHC's compile-time,
108 through the *type-level list* `ss` given to `readTerm`.
109
110 Moreover, those symantic `term`s are parameterized by the type of the value they encode,
111 in order to get the same type safety as with plain Haskell values.
112 Hence the symantic *classes* have the higher kind: `((* -> *) -> Constraint)`
113 instead of just `(* -> Constraint)`.
114
115 Amongst those symantics, `Sym_Lambda` introduces *lambda abstractions* by an higher-order approach,
116 meaning that they directly reuse GHC's internal machinery
117 to abstract or instantiate variables,
118 which I think is by far the most efficient and simplest way of doing it
119 (no (generalized or not) DeBruijn encoding
120 like in [bound](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/bound)'s `Monad`s).
121
122 * __Singleton for any type__.
123 To typecheck terms using a `(Type src vs t)` which acts as a *singleton type*
124 for any Haskell *type index* `t` of any kind,
125 which is made possible with the dependant Haskell extensions:
126 especially `TypeFamilies`, `GADTs` and `TypeInType`.
127
128 * __Type constants using `Typeable`__.
129 *Type constant* could be introduced by indexing them amongst a *type-level list*,
130 but since they are *monomorphic types*, using `Typeable` simplifies
131 the machinery, and is likely more space/time efficient, including at GHC-compile-time.
132
133 * __Type variables using a type-level list__.
134 Handling *type variables* is done by indexing them amongst a `vs` *type-level list*,
135 where each *type variable* is wrapped inside a `Proxy` to handle different kinds.
136 Performing a substitution (in `substVar`) preserves the *type index* `t`,
137 which is key for preserving any associated `Term`.
138 Unifying *type variables* is done with `unsafeCoerce` (in `unifyType`),
139 which I think is necessary and likely safe.
140
141 # Main extensions
142
143 * `AllowAmbiguousTypes` for avoiding a lot of uses of `Proxy`.
144 * `ConstraintKinds` for *type lists* to contain `Constraint`s,
145 or reifying any `Constraint` as an explicit dictionary `Dict`,
146 or defining *type synonym* of *type classes*,
147 or merging *type constraints*.
148 * `DataKinds` for type-level data structures (eg. *type-level lists*).
149 * `DefaultSignatures` for providing identity transformations of terms,
150 and thus avoid boilerplate code when a transformation
151 does not need to alter all semantics.
152 Almost as explained in [Reducing boilerplate in finally tagless style](https://ro-che.info/articles/2016-02-03-finally-tagless-boilerplate).
153 * `GADTs` for knowing types by pattern-matching terms,
154 or building terms by using type classes.
155 * `PolyKinds` for avoiding a lot of uses of `Proxy`.
156 * `Rank2Types` or `ExistentialQuantification` for parsing `GADT`s.
157 * `TypeApplications` for having a more concise syntax
158 to build `Type` (eg. `tyConst @Bool`).
159 * `TypeFamilies` for type-level programming.
160 * `TypeInType` (introduced in GHC 8.0.1)
161 for `Type` to also bind a kind equality for the type `t` it encodes.
162 Which makes the *type application* (`TyApp`)
163 give us an *arrow kind* for the Haskell *type constructor*
164 it applies an Haskell type to, releaving me from tricky workarounds.
165 * `UndecidableInstances` to relax the checks that the type-level programming does terminate.
166
167 # Bugs
168
169 There are some of them hidding in there,
170 and the whole thing is far from being perfect…
171 Your comments, problem reports, or questions, are welcome!
172 You have my email address, so… just send me some emails :]
173
174 # To do
175
176 * Study to which point *type inferencing* is doable,
177 now that `Type` is powerful enough to contain `TyVar`s.
178 * Study to which point error messages can be improved,
179 now that there is a `Source` carried through all `Kind`s or `Type`s,
180 it should enable some nice reports.
181 Still, a lot of work and testing remain to be done,
182 and likely some ideas to find too…
183 * Add more terms in [symantic-lib](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/symantic-lib).
184 * Add more transformations.
185 * Study how to list class instances.
186 * Study where to put `INLINE`, `INLINEABLE` or `SPECIALIZE` pragmas.
187 * Study how to support *rank-N polymorphic types*,
188 special cases can likely use the *boxed polymorphism* workaround,
189 but even if GHC were supporting *impredicative types*,
190 I'm currently clueless about how to do this.